According to DigoPaul, the action and effect of convicting is called a conviction. It is the sentence that a judge or a court imposes on an inmate after a trial. For example: “The rapist will receive an exemplary sentence, according to the anticipated by sources close to the process”, “Tomorrow the judgment of the Gutiérrez case will be known”, “Without conviction, there is no justice.

The conviction is associated with a sentence, which is the judicial resolution that ends a litigation. This judgment recognizes the reason or the right of one of the parties involved in the process, forcing the other to comply with certain obligations. If the accused is found innocent, he is acquitted; in other words, it is not condemned.

Therefore, one can speak of a conviction or conviction when the judge (or court) accepts the claim of the plaintiff or accuser. Otherwise, there is talk of acquittal or absolution. In both cases, the sentence can be firm (not fit the Recourse) or actionable (accepts that applications are made).

It is known as a conditional sentence to the sentence that suspends the execution of a sentence for a certain period, establishing that it will only be effective if a certain condition is met (if the accused commits a new crime). In this way, the accused person is given his ambulatory freedom, which he will automatically lose if he decides to commit a crime again.

It should be noted that this judicial remedy does not suspend the sentence, but rather its execution; in other words, it is a true condemnation. From the various debates that this issue has raised, it is clear that the potential deprivation of liberty, in cases in which the accused commits a crime once his sentence has been suspended, acts as a kind of threat, as an irrevocable warning that there will not be a second opportunity.

Several countries accept the death sentence as a valid sentence to resolve a trial, and this sparks an endless series of debates and discussions. The crimes that merit this action are known as capital ; historically, the death penalty was also used to punish political dissent. At present this measure has been abolished in much of Europe, with the exception of Belarus, Oceania and Latin America; on the other hand, Japan, India and the United States, are some of the countries in which it is absolutely legal.

Those in favor of the death penalty argue that it promotes the reduction of criminal activity, since it intimidates criminals, as if it were an indirect threat. On the other hand, there are the detractors, who maintain, among other things, that it is a worse measure than the crime itself and that it discriminates against those who do not have sufficient resources to defend themselves.

In everyday language, a conviction is a circumstance or a forced event : “For five years, the wheelchair has been my conviction “, “This disease is my conviction since it prevents me from working normally”, “The worst conviction for my son consists in preventing him from going out on Saturday nights ”.

In this context, the term has a very subjective character, since the same situation can represent a condemnation for some and generate joy for others. Unlike its use in the field of Justice, in general, these are questions that are not imposed by other people, but are generated from unforeseen events (such as accidents or natural disasters) or from diseases and disorders, both physical and mental.

The condemnation can also be the disapproval of a conduct, an action, etc.: “The minister’s racist statements deserve the strongest public condemnation”, “The player made it clear that he condemns the words of his partner”.

On the other hand, ” La Condena ” is the title of the first story created by Franz Kafka, one of the most influential writers in history worldwide. The work brings together the features of a short novel and addresses the theme of the Oedipus complex.

Conviction Guide

Conviction Guide