The Latin word acquiescentia came to our language as acquiescence. According to what is detailed by the dictionary developed by the DigoPaul, acquiescence is linked to assent, approval, approval or compliance.
For example: “The player did not attend morning training with the acquiescence of the technical director, who decided to give him the day off so that he could resolve some personal matters”, “The bill would not count on the acquiescence of the ruling bloc”, “The The acquiescence of the man to accept that his children spend all summer with his wife surprised the lawyers. ”
Acquiescence involves giving consent to someone to perform a certain action. If we take our first example, the technical director of a team accepts that a player does not attend training, even though this is part of his fundamental obligations to the team. As for a hypothetical bill without the acquiescence of the ruling bloc, it would be an initiative that does not have the support of the mentioned sector. Finally, there is the case of a man who accepts that his children do not spend the vacation months with him, a decision that the lawyers did not expect.
The concept can acquire certain nuances according to the context. In the legal field, acquiescence to a trial means that the parties comply with their judgment and refuse to file any type of remedy, while acquiescence to a lawsuit is equivalent to recognizing that the other party’s claim is well-founded and, therefore, Therefore, taking a certain action is ruled out.
In the field of psychology, on the other hand, the term acquiescence has a different meaning when found in the context of a test: it is the tendency to choose responses of a certain type, in a thoughtless and spontaneous way, a behavior that invalidates the result and forces a restart. For example, if the person answers “yes” or “no” to everything, he systematically chooses “true” or “false” for all points.
According to the source, acquiescence in psychology is related only to affirmative answers, or to one of the two types in particular. In this context, there is also talk of acquiescence bias to describe the tendency to give affirmative answers beyond the content of the questions. The term bias, on the other hand, refers to a twist or tilt to one side, a specific course or a mistake that is made systematically.
Regardless of the subject’s personality, in order for a psychological test to be successfully resolved, it is necessary to create the appropriate environment, free of tension and distractions. In other words, acquiescence is not always related to a well – defined type of person, but may arise because of the environment.
As its own name, «Aquiescence» is a blog dedicated to news about international law, and it also reserves a space for opinion. Its founder, Carlos Espósito, chose this term to baptize it precisely for the features of equity, good faith and tacit agreement that its definition contains. Lovers of this field can find in this blog information about conferences, follow-ups of different cases and comments that enrich their research and allow them to connect with people who share their interests.
On the other hand, the Aquiescence blog receives the collaboration of many authors and readers who want to express their opinions, leaving the door open to all kinds of points of view, even if they oppose the founder’s. The presence of divergent ideas makes healthy debate possible, something fundamental in issues such as law.
