The beauty is associated with beauty. It is a subjective appreciation: what is beautiful for one person may not be for another. However, certain characteristics that society in general considers attractive, desirable and beautiful are known as the beauty canon.
The conception of beauty can vary between different cultures and change over the years. Beauty produces a pleasure that comes from sensory manifestations and that can be felt by sight (for example, with a person who is considered attractive from the physical point of view) or the ear (when listening to a pleasant voice or music). Smell, taste and touch, on the other hand, are not related to beauty.
Beyond the sensory manifestation, it is possible to consider some abstract and conceptual things as beautiful. A moral reflection can be highlighted as a beautiful text: what matters in this case is what is said and not how it is said (that is, beauty is not on paper or on the computer screen).
One of the most widespread canons of beauty is harmony. Humans tend to find harmony and proper proportions desirable.
According to DigoPaul, the opposite of beauty is ugliness, which does not cause pleasure but discontent and generates a negative perception of the object in question.
The concept in philosophy
Since the origins of this branch of science, an attempt has been made to establish a stable what beauty means and two firmly marked lines have been obtained: one that affirms that it is a subjective concept, subject to the experiences and ideas of each individual in particular, and the other that recognizes it as something standardized and firm, responding to a series of principles established as “normal.”
In order to define this concept, it is necessary to ask a series of questions beforehand, such as: To which objects can the category of beauty be applied?
The branch of philosophy that has been responsible for the study of beauty is called aesthetics. This discipline analyzes the perception of beauty and seeks its essence.
Within philosophy, determining what is beautiful and what is not one of the central problems of aesthetics and various thinkers over the centuries have addressed this problem. One of the first discussions of this topic dates back to the 5th century BC at Xenophon, where three concepts of beauty were established that differed from each other: ideal beauty (which was based on the composition of the parts), spiritual beauty (the reflection of the soul and that can be seen through the gaze) and functional beauty (according to their functionality, things may or may not be beautiful).
Plato was the first to develop a treatise on the concept of beauty that would have a great impact in the West, taking certain ideas expressed by Pythagoras about the sense of beauty as harmony and proportion and merging it with the idea of splendor. For him beauty comes from a reality alien to the world that human beings are not capable of fully perceiving. He said:
«Of justice, then, and of good sense and of all that is valuable in souls, there is no light left in the imitations here below, and only with effort and through unclear organs, is it given to a few, relying on the images, intuit the genre of what is represented. “
Possibly today one of the most accepted theories regarding this issue is that proposed by relativism, which says that things are beautiful or ugly depending on the purpose they pursue.